<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 69 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354648</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on housekeeping and cleaning services was examined in the context of services used at branch offices and credit distributed from head office. The Tribunal noted that an earlier order in the assessee&#039;s own case had already remanded the matter to verify whether the assessee fell within the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947, but the lower authorities had not examined that question. As the eligibility of the input services depended on that verification, the dispute was sent back to the original authority for fresh examination after hearing both sides, and the disallowance was not finally sustained on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 69 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354648</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on housekeeping and cleaning services was examined in the context of services used at branch offices and credit distributed from head office. The Tribunal noted that an earlier order in the assessee&#039;s own case had already remanded the matter to verify whether the assessee fell within the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947, but the lower authorities had not examined that question. As the eligibility of the input services depended on that verification, the dispute was sent back to the original authority for fresh examination after hearing both sides, and the disallowance was not finally sustained on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>