<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1685 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198515</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the application for rectification of errors in the Final Order dated 4-10-2016, recalling the order and directing the appeals to be relisted for a fresh hearing. The decision was based on the acknowledgment of crucial clarifications and materials not adequately addressed in the previous order, ensuring justice and fairness to both parties. The Tribunal exercised its authority to rectify the oversight and uphold the principles of a fair adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 09:01:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1685 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198515</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the application for rectification of errors in the Final Order dated 4-10-2016, recalling the order and directing the appeals to be relisted for a fresh hearing. The decision was based on the acknowledgment of crucial clarifications and materials not adequately addressed in the previous order, ensuring justice and fairness to both parties. The Tribunal exercised its authority to rectify the oversight and uphold the principles of a fair adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>