https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198520 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant on both issues. It held that the demand for Commercial or Industrial Construction Services before 1.6.2007 was unsustainable, citing precedent. Additionally, the Tribunal considered the procedural error of availing credit on inputs before payment, noting the timely settlement of dues within three months. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with necessary consequential relief granted. en-us Wed, 09 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Feb 2018 09:01:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198520 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant on both issues. It held that the demand for Commercial or Industrial Construction Services before 1.6.2007 was unsustainable, citing precedent. Additionally, the Tribunal considered the procedural error of availing credit on inputs before payment, noting the timely settlement of dues within three months. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with necessary consequential relief granted. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 09 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198520