<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 67 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11704</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, denying the claimed deduction for business loss and affirming that the factum of embezzlement was not adequately proven. The appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded, as the court found no grounds to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 67 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11704</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, denying the claimed deduction for business loss and affirming that the factum of embezzlement was not adequately proven. The appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded, as the court found no grounds to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>