<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 37 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11702</link>
    <description>Interest earned by a co-operative bank on PSEB bonds acquired as a statutory investment and maintained as part of statutory reserves was treated as attributable to banking business and deductible under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The court held that, where the investment is made in compliance with statutory requirements and forms part of statutory reserves, the character of the funds used is immaterial; it does not matter whether the money came from surplus funds or circulating capital. The distinction drawn in later authority concerning voluntary reserves was inapplicable because the investment here was not from voluntary reserves.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 37 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11702</link>
      <description>Interest earned by a co-operative bank on PSEB bonds acquired as a statutory investment and maintained as part of statutory reserves was treated as attributable to banking business and deductible under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The court held that, where the investment is made in compliance with statutory requirements and forms part of statutory reserves, the character of the funds used is immaterial; it does not matter whether the money came from surplus funds or circulating capital. The distinction drawn in later authority concerning voluntary reserves was inapplicable because the investment here was not from voluntary reserves.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>