<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 37 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11700</link>
    <description>The High Court held that salary and consultancy fees paid to partners representing their Hindu undivided families as kartas should be disallowed under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the decision to disallow the expenditure incurred by the partnership firm. The case outcome favored the Revenue, and the reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 37 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11700</link>
      <description>The High Court held that salary and consultancy fees paid to partners representing their Hindu undivided families as kartas should be disallowed under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the decision to disallow the expenditure incurred by the partnership firm. The case outcome favored the Revenue, and the reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>