<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 631 - COMPANY LAW BOARD NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198493</link>
    <description>The court directed respondent No. 1 to recover interest on the loan granted to respondent No. 3 and dismissed the other prayers of the petitioner. The court found no grounds for a special audit or the removal of the managing director and other directors. The petition was disposed of with the direction regarding the interest on the loan.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 17:54:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 631 - COMPANY LAW BOARD NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198493</link>
      <description>The court directed respondent No. 1 to recover interest on the loan granted to respondent No. 3 and dismissed the other prayers of the petitioner. The court found no grounds for a special audit or the removal of the managing director and other directors. The petition was disposed of with the direction regarding the interest on the loan.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>