<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 35 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11697</link>
    <description>Section 263 of the Income-tax Act was held to be of wide amplitude and capable of revising a summary assessment made under section 143(1)(a), because the provision contains no words excluding such orders from its scope. Circular No. 176 did not curtail the statutory revisional power; at most, it noted a restriction against revision where the tax effect is negligible. The Commissioner therefore had jurisdiction to invoke section 263 against the summary assessment, and the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was not legally sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 35 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11697</link>
      <description>Section 263 of the Income-tax Act was held to be of wide amplitude and capable of revising a summary assessment made under section 143(1)(a), because the provision contains no words excluding such orders from its scope. Circular No. 176 did not curtail the statutory revisional power; at most, it noted a restriction against revision where the tax effect is negligible. The Commissioner therefore had jurisdiction to invoke section 263 against the summary assessment, and the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was not legally sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>