<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (1) TMI 305 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198492</link>
    <description>A refund or exemption claim rejected solely on limitation was found unsustainable where the claim otherwise required consideration on merits. The Court applied the principle that limitation should not be used to defeat an otherwise just claim and held the impugned order contrary to that approach. The rejection order was set aside, and the authority was directed to examine the petitioner&#039;s claim afresh on merits in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 17:08:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (1) TMI 305 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198492</link>
      <description>A refund or exemption claim rejected solely on limitation was found unsustainable where the claim otherwise required consideration on merits. The Court applied the principle that limitation should not be used to defeat an otherwise just claim and held the impugned order contrary to that approach. The rejection order was set aside, and the authority was directed to examine the petitioner&#039;s claim afresh on merits in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>