<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 52 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11689</link>
    <description>Remuneration paid by a firm to an individual working partner is not disallowable under section 40(b) merely because the partner is a nominee of a Hindu undivided family. The partnership relationship exists between the firm and the individual partner, and the Hindu undivided family does not enter that contractual arrangement. A partner may account to his family for amounts received, but for assessment of the firm the payment remains one to the partner as such. Explanation 4 to section 40(b) reinforces this position by treating a working partner as an individual actively engaged in the firm&#039;s business, even if he represents a Hindu undivided family.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 52 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11689</link>
      <description>Remuneration paid by a firm to an individual working partner is not disallowable under section 40(b) merely because the partner is a nominee of a Hindu undivided family. The partnership relationship exists between the firm and the individual partner, and the Hindu undivided family does not enter that contractual arrangement. A partner may account to his family for amounts received, but for assessment of the firm the payment remains one to the partner as such. Explanation 4 to section 40(b) reinforces this position by treating a working partner as an individual actively engaged in the firm&#039;s business, even if he represents a Hindu undivided family.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>