https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198486 Unauthorized possession of hazardous explosive substances or lethal weapons capable of mass destruction can attract Section 4(b) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 even where Section 4(a) is inapplicable because the notified area requirement is not met. The Review Committee's role under Section 60 is confined to a prima facie assessment and it cannot weigh the sufficiency of evidence or decide guilt on merits. Where a prosecutable case exists, withdrawal of the proceedings is not sustainable, and a transfer of the criminal cases outside the State may be ordered where the circumstances create a real apprehension of unfair trial. en-us Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Jul 2025 13:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198486 Unauthorized possession of hazardous explosive substances or lethal weapons capable of mass destruction can attract Section 4(b) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 even where Section 4(a) is inapplicable because the notified area requirement is not met. The Review Committee's role under Section 60 is confined to a prima facie assessment and it cannot weigh the sufficiency of evidence or decide guilt on merits. Where a prosecutable case exists, withdrawal of the proceedings is not sustainable, and a transfer of the criminal cases outside the State may be ordered where the circumstances create a real apprehension of unfair trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198486