https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198485 In a suit for specific performance, impleadment under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC depends on whether the proposed party is necessary for an effective decree or proper for complete adjudication. The plaintiff remains dominus litis, and only contracting parties, their legal representatives, or transferees are ordinarily necessary parties. A person with no present right, title or interest in the suit property, and only a contingent expectation of future acquisition, cannot claim impleadment. A reference to section 12A of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 did not alter that position because the lessee's powers were confined to the demised area. The appellant was therefore neither a necessary nor a proper party. en-us Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Sep 2023 11:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198485 In a suit for specific performance, impleadment under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC depends on whether the proposed party is necessary for an effective decree or proper for complete adjudication. The plaintiff remains dominus litis, and only contracting parties, their legal representatives, or transferees are ordinarily necessary parties. A person with no present right, title or interest in the suit property, and only a contingent expectation of future acquisition, cannot claim impleadment. A reference to section 12A of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 did not alter that position because the lessee's powers were confined to the demised area. The appellant was therefore neither a necessary nor a proper party. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198485