https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198479 A winding up petition was admitted where the petitioner established an admitted debt arising from a written arrangement, supported by payment of security deposit and advance rent. The respondent's alternative explanation for the received sums was rejected because it was not backed by the documentary record and was treated as a sham defence. Presumption of service of the statutory notice was drawn from the dispatch record, and the oral version contrary to admitted documents was not accepted under the documentary evidence rule. On the material placed on record, the debt was treated as established and the respondent was found unwilling and unable to pay. en-us Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Feb 2018 10:12:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198479 A winding up petition was admitted where the petitioner established an admitted debt arising from a written arrangement, supported by payment of security deposit and advance rent. The respondent's alternative explanation for the received sums was rejected because it was not backed by the documentary record and was treated as a sham defence. Presumption of service of the statutory notice was drawn from the dispatch record, and the oral version contrary to admitted documents was not accepted under the documentary evidence rule. On the material placed on record, the debt was treated as established and the respondent was found unwilling and unable to pay. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198479