https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198476 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's decision to direct the return of the jewellery or payment of its value. The appellant's arguments regarding the jewellery return, authenticity of the receipt, circumstances, suit maintainability, and liability as a joint Hindu family member were all rejected. The Court found no evidence of misappropriation by Lachhmi Narain and held the appellant liable for the debt unless proven illegal, which was not established. The appeal was dismissed with costs. en-us Mon, 16 Oct 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Feb 2018 09:47:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198476 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's decision to direct the return of the jewellery or payment of its value. The appellant's arguments regarding the jewellery return, authenticity of the receipt, circumstances, suit maintainability, and liability as a joint Hindu family member were all rejected. The Court found no evidence of misappropriation by Lachhmi Narain and held the appellant liable for the debt unless proven illegal, which was not established. The appeal was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 16 Oct 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198476