<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 32 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11676</link>
    <description>The High Court concluded that income from complex letting should be bifurcated into &#039;income from house property&#039; for rent and &#039;income from business&#039; for services rendered. The Tribunal was directed to reassess the income of the assessee accordingly. The court largely ruled in favor of the assessee, except for the depreciation claims related to buildings. The reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 32 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11676</link>
      <description>The High Court concluded that income from complex letting should be bifurcated into &#039;income from house property&#039; for rent and &#039;income from business&#039; for services rendered. The Tribunal was directed to reassess the income of the assessee accordingly. The court largely ruled in favor of the assessee, except for the depreciation claims related to buildings. The reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>