<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 40 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354619</link>
    <description>The Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee regarding the exclusion of communication expenses from turnover for deduction under Section 10A, citing a Karnataka High Court decision. The issue of excluding certain companies based on size and turnover was partly allowed in favor of the revenue. The exclusion of M/s Celestial Biolabs Ltd. was decided in favor of the revenue. The rejection of the employee cost filter was in favor of the revenue. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on the diminishing revenue and different financial year filters. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of certain companies from the set of comparables and upheld the adjustment to interest on external commercial borrowings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 40 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354619</link>
      <description>The Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee regarding the exclusion of communication expenses from turnover for deduction under Section 10A, citing a Karnataka High Court decision. The issue of excluding certain companies based on size and turnover was partly allowed in favor of the revenue. The exclusion of M/s Celestial Biolabs Ltd. was decided in favor of the revenue. The rejection of the employee cost filter was in favor of the revenue. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on the diminishing revenue and different financial year filters. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of certain companies from the set of comparables and upheld the adjustment to interest on external commercial borrowings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>