<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 35 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354614</link>
    <description>The court found paragraph 4.3 of Circular No. 06/2008-Cus. to be ultra vires and contrary to Section 27A of the Customs Act, directing the respondents to pay interest on delayed refunds of Special Additional Duty (SAD) within eight weeks. The court emphasized that interest on delayed refunds is a statutory right under Section 27A and that administrative circulars cannot override statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 35 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354614</link>
      <description>The court found paragraph 4.3 of Circular No. 06/2008-Cus. to be ultra vires and contrary to Section 27A of the Customs Act, directing the respondents to pay interest on delayed refunds of Special Additional Duty (SAD) within eight weeks. The court emphasized that interest on delayed refunds is a statutory right under Section 27A and that administrative circulars cannot override statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>