<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 7 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354586</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders confirming demands for contravention of Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, finding that procedural lapses should not disentitle the appellants from claiming credit if goods were used in final product manufacture and duty was paid. Emphasizing the importance of using inputs in manufacturing and paying appropriate duty, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, citing legal precedents to support its decision. The judgment was pronounced on 25.01.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 06:38:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 7 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354586</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders confirming demands for contravention of Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, finding that procedural lapses should not disentitle the appellants from claiming credit if goods were used in final product manufacture and duty was paid. Emphasizing the importance of using inputs in manufacturing and paying appropriate duty, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, citing legal precedents to support its decision. The judgment was pronounced on 25.01.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>