<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354580</link>
    <description>Steel items such as channels, sheets and angles used in construction-related activity at the assessee&#039;s premises were treated as eligible inputs for credit, following binding precedent and the department&#039;s own allegation of such use in the show-cause notice; credit was therefore allowed on the disputed items. The demand was also largely time-barred because it related to an earlier period, the notice did not allege suppression or misstatement with intent to evade duty, and the credit had been reflected in statutory records, so the extended limitation period could not be invoked. Only the unchallenged transformer oil credit remained confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 06:37:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354580</link>
      <description>Steel items such as channels, sheets and angles used in construction-related activity at the assessee&#039;s premises were treated as eligible inputs for credit, following binding precedent and the department&#039;s own allegation of such use in the show-cause notice; credit was therefore allowed on the disputed items. The demand was also largely time-barred because it related to an earlier period, the notice did not allege suppression or misstatement with intent to evade duty, and the credit had been reflected in statutory records, so the extended limitation period could not be invoked. Only the unchallenged transformer oil credit remained confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>