<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1162 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198463</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that subjecting duty paid Black Wire to galvanization and clearance does not amount to manufacture. They found the show cause notice misconceived, emphasizing that galvanization alone does not constitute manufacture. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, with the Tribunal setting aside the demand for Central Excise duty and confirming that the appellant had correctly paid duty by reversing credit as per the rules. The judgment highlighted the significance of adhering to relevant circulars and rules in determining excisability, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 18:24:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1162 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198463</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that subjecting duty paid Black Wire to galvanization and clearance does not amount to manufacture. They found the show cause notice misconceived, emphasizing that galvanization alone does not constitute manufacture. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, with the Tribunal setting aside the demand for Central Excise duty and confirming that the appellant had correctly paid duty by reversing credit as per the rules. The judgment highlighted the significance of adhering to relevant circulars and rules in determining excisability, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>