<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1163 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198464</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside undervaluation charges for imported used tyres with metallic frames but upheld charges for tyres without metallic frames and policy violations. The Tribunal allowed a Review Order Modification application to determine the Redemption fine (RF) and Penalty, reducing the RF from &amp;amp;8377;1.75 lakhs to &amp;amp;8377;1 lakh and the penalty from &amp;amp;8377;50,000 to &amp;amp;8377;25,000 based on an estimated duty difference of around 2.5 lakhs for both types of tyres. The penalty for policy violation remained unchanged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 18:24:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1163 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198464</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside undervaluation charges for imported used tyres with metallic frames but upheld charges for tyres without metallic frames and policy violations. The Tribunal allowed a Review Order Modification application to determine the Redemption fine (RF) and Penalty, reducing the RF from &amp;amp;8377;1.75 lakhs to &amp;amp;8377;1 lakh and the penalty from &amp;amp;8377;50,000 to &amp;amp;8377;25,000 based on an estimated duty difference of around 2.5 lakhs for both types of tyres. The penalty for policy violation remained unchanged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>