<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1308 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354572</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and Tribunal, ruling that the payment of Rs. 70,00,000 was a business loss incurred during the course of business activities. Therefore, the disallowance of bad debts under section 36(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was not justified. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose from the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 18:16:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1308 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354572</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and Tribunal, ruling that the payment of Rs. 70,00,000 was a business loss incurred during the course of business activities. Therefore, the disallowance of bad debts under section 36(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was not justified. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose from the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>