<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 63 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11664</link>
    <description>A valid certificate issued under the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997 confers statutory immunity where the declarant satisfies the scheme conditions and the certificate is not shown to have been obtained on legally sustainable grounds of ineligibility or falsity of material particulars. On the facts noted, the declarant was eligible to file the disclosure because no notice under sections 142(1) or 148 had been issued and no action under sections 132(1) or 133A had been taken. The omission to mention seizure in the declaration did not defeat protection, and the department could not disregard the valid certificate or continue covered proceedings under sections 158BD and 158BC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 63 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11664</link>
      <description>A valid certificate issued under the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997 confers statutory immunity where the declarant satisfies the scheme conditions and the certificate is not shown to have been obtained on legally sustainable grounds of ineligibility or falsity of material particulars. On the facts noted, the declarant was eligible to file the disclosure because no notice under sections 142(1) or 148 had been issued and no action under sections 132(1) or 133A had been taken. The omission to mention seizure in the declaration did not defeat protection, and the department could not disregard the valid certificate or continue covered proceedings under sections 158BD and 158BC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>