https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198447 Section 64-A of the Motor Vehicles Act empowers the Government to revise subordinate transport orders on grounds of legality, regularity, or propriety, and "propriety" allows a broader review of competing administrative choices in the public interest. In stage carriage permit matters, the statutory authority's policy judgment will not be displaced merely because another view is possible. High Court interference under Article 226 is confined to cases involving irrelevant or extraneous considerations, mala fides, bias, or lack of jurisdiction. As the Government examined the record, gave reasons, and acted within its statutory remit, its revisional order was valid and was not liable to be quashed. en-us Fri, 16 Sep 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jan 2018 15:24:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198447 Section 64-A of the Motor Vehicles Act empowers the Government to revise subordinate transport orders on grounds of legality, regularity, or propriety, and "propriety" allows a broader review of competing administrative choices in the public interest. In stage carriage permit matters, the statutory authority's policy judgment will not be displaced merely because another view is possible. High Court interference under Article 226 is confined to cases involving irrelevant or extraneous considerations, mala fides, bias, or lack of jurisdiction. As the Government examined the record, gave reasons, and acted within its statutory remit, its revisional order was valid and was not liable to be quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Sep 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198447