https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198446 A declaratory decree against an alienation of ancestral property did not nullify the transfer for all purposes; it preserved the reversion so the property returned to the alienor's estate on his death. Because succession opened after the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 came into force, the estate devolved under that Act, entitling the widow and daughters to inherit with the sons. The appellate court could also mould relief under Order 41 Rule 33 CPC in favour of heirs who had not filed an appeal or cross-objections, where complete justice required adjustment of the estate among all entitled parties. en-us Tue, 11 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jan 2018 15:18:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198446 A declaratory decree against an alienation of ancestral property did not nullify the transfer for all purposes; it preserved the reversion so the property returned to the alienor's estate on his death. Because succession opened after the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 came into force, the estate devolved under that Act, entitling the widow and daughters to inherit with the sons. The appellate court could also mould relief under Order 41 Rule 33 CPC in favour of heirs who had not filed an appeal or cross-objections, where complete justice required adjustment of the estate among all entitled parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198446