<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 600 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198434</link>
    <description>Tender conditions for high security registration plates requiring prior experience, financial capacity, and long-term commitment were upheld because they had a rational nexus with technical competence, supply security, and uninterrupted implementation of the scheme, and no mala fides or discriminatory design was shown. Rule 50 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 was construed to permit selection of a single approved manufacturer for a State or region where that arrangement facilitates the statutory scheme. Paragraph 4(x) of the Motor Vehicles (New High Security Registration Plates) Order, 2001 was not treated as ultra vires, as the order was read as supporting implementation of the regulatory purpose. The scheme, tender framework, and order were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2024 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 600 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198434</link>
      <description>Tender conditions for high security registration plates requiring prior experience, financial capacity, and long-term commitment were upheld because they had a rational nexus with technical competence, supply security, and uninterrupted implementation of the scheme, and no mala fides or discriminatory design was shown. Rule 50 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 was construed to permit selection of a single approved manufacturer for a State or region where that arrangement facilitates the statutory scheme. Paragraph 4(x) of the Motor Vehicles (New High Security Registration Plates) Order, 2001 was not treated as ultra vires, as the order was read as supporting implementation of the regulatory purpose. The scheme, tender framework, and order were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>