https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198431 Tender eligibility conditions are treated as matters of contract and administrative policy, and judicial review under Article 226 is confined to cases of arbitrariness, discrimination, mala fides, bias, or other illegality. The court noted that the eligibility criteria were revised by the competent authority to secure quality supply and wider participation, and the increased turnover requirement was not shown to be exclusionary or arbitrary. The corrigendum was also found to be within the procurement framework, including the power to modify tender terms and the requirement of recorded reasons where time is reduced. The challenge to the tender conditions therefore failed, and no interference with the notification or modified criteria was warranted. en-us Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jan 2018 11:11:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198431 Tender eligibility conditions are treated as matters of contract and administrative policy, and judicial review under Article 226 is confined to cases of arbitrariness, discrimination, mala fides, bias, or other illegality. The court noted that the eligibility criteria were revised by the competent authority to secure quality supply and wider participation, and the increased turnover requirement was not shown to be exclusionary or arbitrary. The corrigendum was also found to be within the procurement framework, including the power to modify tender terms and the requirement of recorded reasons where time is reduced. The challenge to the tender conditions therefore failed, and no interference with the notification or modified criteria was warranted. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198431