<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1297 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354561</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 28,66,577 to their income. The Tribunal found that the disputed sum in the TDS certificate was not the Assessee&#039;s income, except for van charges reimbursement, and therefore, the Assessee could not claim TDS credit on that amount. The decision was based on the lack of evidence establishing the sum as the Assessee&#039;s income, leading to the partial allowance of the Assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 10:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1297 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354561</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 28,66,577 to their income. The Tribunal found that the disputed sum in the TDS certificate was not the Assessee&#039;s income, except for van charges reimbursement, and therefore, the Assessee could not claim TDS credit on that amount. The decision was based on the lack of evidence establishing the sum as the Assessee&#039;s income, leading to the partial allowance of the Assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>