<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1296 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354560</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the AO&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the necessity for the assessee to substantiate interest payments and stressing the importance of detailed orders in tax matters. The case highlights the significance of providing evidence to support claims and the need for thorough examination of financial transactions in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 10:02:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1296 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354560</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the AO&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the necessity for the assessee to substantiate interest payments and stressing the importance of detailed orders in tax matters. The case highlights the significance of providing evidence to support claims and the need for thorough examination of financial transactions in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>