<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 24 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11660</link>
    <description>The Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 was construed to fix the amount payable on tax arrears consisting only of penalty at fifty per cent of the arrear, with no separate liability for interest on that penalty amount. The Calcutta HC held that the departmental clarification adding interest misread the Scheme and was unauthorised. The levy of interest on the penalty arrears was therefore set aside, although interest was still directed from 30 days after the determination order until payment because the assessee had retained the Scheme benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 24 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11660</link>
      <description>The Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 was construed to fix the amount payable on tax arrears consisting only of penalty at fifty per cent of the arrear, with no separate liability for interest on that penalty amount. The Calcutta HC held that the departmental clarification adding interest misread the Scheme and was unauthorised. The levy of interest on the penalty arrears was therefore set aside, although interest was still directed from 30 days after the determination order until payment because the assessee had retained the Scheme benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>