<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1270 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354534</link>
    <description>The Tribunal recalled the final order due to an error in noting the payment of disputed service tax amount before the Show Cause Notice, which was actually paid before. Penalties under section 78 were set aside as the service tax was paid before the notice issuance. The appeal was partly allowed, confirming service tax, interest, and penalty under section 77, while penalties under section 78 were revoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 08:07:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1270 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354534</link>
      <description>The Tribunal recalled the final order due to an error in noting the payment of disputed service tax amount before the Show Cause Notice, which was actually paid before. Penalties under section 78 were set aside as the service tax was paid before the notice issuance. The appeal was partly allowed, confirming service tax, interest, and penalty under section 77, while penalties under section 78 were revoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>