https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354523 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the original authority and Commissioner (Appeals) decisions. It held that the correction of duty payment entries in the CENVAT register without prior permission was justified as a correction of entries, not requiring a refund claim. The Tribunal emphasized that the duty was wrongly paid, and recredit was permissible, citing relevant precedents. The technical objection raised by the Revenue was dismissed, and the appellant was granted consequential relief. en-us Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jan 2018 08:04:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354523 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the original authority and Commissioner (Appeals) decisions. It held that the correction of duty payment entries in the CENVAT register without prior permission was justified as a correction of entries, not requiring a refund claim. The Tribunal emphasized that the duty was wrongly paid, and recredit was permissible, citing relevant precedents. The technical objection raised by the Revenue was dismissed, and the appellant was granted consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354523