<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 574 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198413</link>
    <description>A winding up petition cannot be maintained on the basis of an unadjudicated claim for compensation that is bona fide disputed and therefore not a debt due. Supreme Court interim and final orders in separate liquor-control proceedings did not create an enforceable liability against a company that was not a party to those proceedings. The claim was also treated as time-barred on the petitioner&#039;s own version, and that further undermined enforceability. Winding up on the just and equitable ground was unavailable because no factual foundation was pleaded and the company was shown to be solvent, commercially viable, and profitable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 18:39:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 574 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198413</link>
      <description>A winding up petition cannot be maintained on the basis of an unadjudicated claim for compensation that is bona fide disputed and therefore not a debt due. Supreme Court interim and final orders in separate liquor-control proceedings did not create an enforceable liability against a company that was not a party to those proceedings. The claim was also treated as time-barred on the petitioner&#039;s own version, and that further undermined enforceability. Winding up on the just and equitable ground was unavailable because no factual foundation was pleaded and the company was shown to be solvent, commercially viable, and profitable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>