<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (4) TMI 293 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198396</link>
    <description>The court granted an injunction against further construction by the plaintiff until the suit&#039;s disposal, allowing the defendant to seek further interim orders if necessary. The judgment emphasizes complexities in lease agreement disputes, allegations of trespass, and legal principles governing interlocutory reliefs. The decision reflects a balance of equities and preservation of rights pending final adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:51:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (4) TMI 293 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198396</link>
      <description>The court granted an injunction against further construction by the plaintiff until the suit&#039;s disposal, allowing the defendant to seek further interim orders if necessary. The judgment emphasizes complexities in lease agreement disputes, allegations of trespass, and legal principles governing interlocutory reliefs. The decision reflects a balance of equities and preservation of rights pending final adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>