https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198395 Order 39, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure was treated as broad enough to support a temporary injunction application by a defendant, not only by a plaintiff, where necessary to preserve the subject matter and maintain status quo during the suit. The provision was also read as covering injunctions that may be prohibitory or mandatory in effect, depending on the circumstances. Where such an order is appealable under Order 43, Rule 1(r), revisional jurisdiction cannot be invoked if an appeal lies. The impugned order was therefore regarded as appealable, and the civil revision petition as not maintainable. en-us Wed, 10 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:44:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198395 Order 39, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure was treated as broad enough to support a temporary injunction application by a defendant, not only by a plaintiff, where necessary to preserve the subject matter and maintain status quo during the suit. The provision was also read as covering injunctions that may be prohibitory or mandatory in effect, depending on the circumstances. Where such an order is appealable under Order 43, Rule 1(r), revisional jurisdiction cannot be invoked if an appeal lies. The impugned order was therefore regarded as appealable, and the civil revision petition as not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198395