<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1170 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198392</link>
    <description>The Court affirmed its jurisdiction to validate the sale of shares post winding-up order under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act. It held that such validation is permissible until the company&#039;s dissolution. The Court found the applicant&#039;s actions bona fide, aimed at reviving the company, and validated the share transfer, dismissing objections by the Liquidator and secured creditors. The Court granted the requested relief, safeguarding the applicant&#039;s transactions for the company&#039;s benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:01:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1170 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198392</link>
      <description>The Court affirmed its jurisdiction to validate the sale of shares post winding-up order under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act. It held that such validation is permissible until the company&#039;s dissolution. The Court found the applicant&#039;s actions bona fide, aimed at reviving the company, and validated the share transfer, dismissing objections by the Liquidator and secured creditors. The Court granted the requested relief, safeguarding the applicant&#039;s transactions for the company&#039;s benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>