https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198386 In second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a High Court cannot reappreciate evidence and disturb a first appellate court's finding of fact on title merely because another view is possible. Where the first appellate court's conclusion rests on documentary, oral, and circumstantial evidence, interference is confined to substantial questions of law, not a fresh evaluation of the same material as in first appeal. The Court held that the High Court acted without jurisdiction in overturning the factual finding, and the decree was set aside. en-us Mon, 19 May 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:12:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198386 In second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a High Court cannot reappreciate evidence and disturb a first appellate court's finding of fact on title merely because another view is possible. Where the first appellate court's conclusion rests on documentary, oral, and circumstantial evidence, interference is confined to substantial questions of law, not a fresh evaluation of the same material as in first appeal. The Court held that the High Court acted without jurisdiction in overturning the factual finding, and the decree was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 May 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198386