<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1239 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354503</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the write-off of advances for business expansion, citing them as incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business under section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The issue of expenditure towards APGENCO was remanded to the AO for verification. The appeal of the revenue was allowed for statistical purposes, the claim under section 80IB was upheld, and the disallowance of bad debts was dismissed as not pressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 11:39:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1239 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354503</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the write-off of advances for business expansion, citing them as incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business under section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The issue of expenditure towards APGENCO was remanded to the AO for verification. The appeal of the revenue was allowed for statistical purposes, the claim under section 80IB was upheld, and the disallowance of bad debts was dismissed as not pressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>