<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 48 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11648</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to categorize the interest income from fixed deposits as income from other sources rather than business income under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court found that the interest was not linked to export-related activities and that the assessee failed to comply with the prescribed form requirements for deduction eligibility. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 48 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11648</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to categorize the interest income from fixed deposits as income from other sources rather than business income under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court found that the interest was not linked to export-related activities and that the assessee failed to comply with the prescribed form requirements for deduction eligibility. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>