<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1237 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354501</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the disallowance of the deduction under Section 54F and the addition of Rs. 20.00 lakhs under Section 68, while accepting the source for Rs. 6.00 lakhs. The judgment highlights the necessity of providing conclusive evidence and adhering to statutory conditions for tax exemptions and explaining cash deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 11:37:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1237 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354501</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the disallowance of the deduction under Section 54F and the addition of Rs. 20.00 lakhs under Section 68, while accepting the source for Rs. 6.00 lakhs. The judgment highlights the necessity of providing conclusive evidence and adhering to statutory conditions for tax exemptions and explaining cash deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>