<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1184 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198377</link>
    <description>An unregistered sale deed required to be registered remains admissible in a suit for specific performance for the limited purpose of proving the contract between the parties. Section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908 bars such a document from affecting immovable property or proving a transaction affecting it, but its proviso expressly allows admission as evidence of a contract in a specific performance suit and of a collateral transaction not requiring registration. The provision for a suit under Section 77 does not exclude this limited evidentiary use where the action seeks specific performance rather than registration of the document. Refusal to mark the deed was therefore erroneous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1184 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198377</link>
      <description>An unregistered sale deed required to be registered remains admissible in a suit for specific performance for the limited purpose of proving the contract between the parties. Section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908 bars such a document from affecting immovable property or proving a transaction affecting it, but its proviso expressly allows admission as evidence of a contract in a specific performance suit and of a collateral transaction not requiring registration. The provision for a suit under Section 77 does not exclude this limited evidentiary use where the action seeks specific performance rather than registration of the document. Refusal to mark the deed was therefore erroneous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>