<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 56 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11645</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to confirm the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer regarding non-interest bearing deposits and non-refundable entrance fees received by the assessee was upheld by the High Court. The court found the Assessing Officer&#039;s determinations arbitrary and lacking consideration for market rent and capital nature of entrance fees, respectively. Emphasizing factual findings and legal precedents, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 56 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11645</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to confirm the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer regarding non-interest bearing deposits and non-refundable entrance fees received by the assessee was upheld by the High Court. The court found the Assessing Officer&#039;s determinations arbitrary and lacking consideration for market rent and capital nature of entrance fees, respectively. Emphasizing factual findings and legal precedents, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>