<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1219 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354483</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s service tax liability for considerations received from RICO Industries Ltd. was disputed. The Tribunal held that the demand proceedings were improper and the termination payment was not taxable under Business Auxiliary Service. The termination payment was considered compensation for business loss, not a specific service, leading to the unsustainable tax liability. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 09:22:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1219 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354483</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s service tax liability for considerations received from RICO Industries Ltd. was disputed. The Tribunal held that the demand proceedings were improper and the termination payment was not taxable under Business Auxiliary Service. The termination payment was considered compensation for business loss, not a specific service, leading to the unsustainable tax liability. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>