<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1217 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354481</link>
    <description>The Tribunal analyzed the activities of deputing employees, the applicability of service tax on salary reimbursements, confirmation of demand under a specific service category, and interpretation of legal provisions. Relying on precedents and legal interpretations, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demand confirmation and allowing the appeal with consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1217 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354481</link>
      <description>The Tribunal analyzed the activities of deputing employees, the applicability of service tax on salary reimbursements, confirmation of demand under a specific service category, and interpretation of legal provisions. Relying on precedents and legal interpretations, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demand confirmation and allowing the appeal with consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>