<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1198 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354462</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority for verification of the correlation between invoices issued by subcontractors and those issued by the principal contractor/CHA. Once the correlation is established, the appellant will be eligible for credit, as per the previous Tribunal decision in their own case. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, providing consequential relief if necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1198 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354462</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority for verification of the correlation between invoices issued by subcontractors and those issued by the principal contractor/CHA. Once the correlation is established, the appellant will be eligible for credit, as per the previous Tribunal decision in their own case. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, providing consequential relief if necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>