https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354461 Prior rulings on the same goods were applied to uphold the assessee's classification of Bajji Bonda Mix, Adai Mix and idly chilli powder, with the latter accepted under Chapter 9 and the department's Chapter 21 proposal rejected. Because the dispute was one of tariff interpretation and no suppression of facts could be attributed on that basis, extended limitation was not available. The departmental appeals therefore failed on both classification and limitation, and the appellate order was sustained. en-us Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354461 Prior rulings on the same goods were applied to uphold the assessee's classification of Bajji Bonda Mix, Adai Mix and idly chilli powder, with the latter accepted under Chapter 9 and the department's Chapter 21 proposal rejected. Because the dispute was one of tariff interpretation and no suppression of facts could be attributed on that basis, extended limitation was not available. The departmental appeals therefore failed on both classification and limitation, and the appellate order was sustained. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354461