<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1426 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198363</link>
    <description>The Tribunal declined to admit additional evidence sought by the revenue regarding unsecured loans and dismissed the revised grounds. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions related to loans from certain companies, concluding that the tax authorities failed to disprove the genuineness of the transactions. As a result, the appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:26:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1426 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198363</link>
      <description>The Tribunal declined to admit additional evidence sought by the revenue regarding unsecured loans and dismissed the revised grounds. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions related to loans from certain companies, concluding that the tax authorities failed to disprove the genuineness of the transactions. As a result, the appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>