<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1406 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198364</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the appeal, setting aside the order denying the appellant&#039;s right to Cenvat credit when final products became exempt from excise duty. The tribunal held that the law recognizing the abridgment of vested rights was introduced after the case, thus allowing the appellant to claim the Cenvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:26:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1406 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198364</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the appeal, setting aside the order denying the appellant&#039;s right to Cenvat credit when final products became exempt from excise duty. The tribunal held that the law recognizing the abridgment of vested rights was introduced after the case, thus allowing the appellant to claim the Cenvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>