<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1526 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198367</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution after the appellant failed to appear when the matter was called for final hearing, including on the earlier date fixed for hearing. The order records only the absence of the appellant and disposes of the appeal on that procedural default, without entering into the merits of the underlying dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:26:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1526 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198367</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution after the appellant failed to appear when the matter was called for final hearing, including on the earlier date fixed for hearing. The order records only the absence of the appellant and disposes of the appeal on that procedural default, without entering into the merits of the underlying dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>