https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11640 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, stating that the liability for unearned increase could not be imposed on the purchasers as it was not part of the auction terms. The Tax Authority was directed to pay the unearned increase to the DDA, who would then process the necessary documents and permissions for the petitioner. The writ petition was allowed, and the parties were directed to bear their own costs. en-us Fri, 22 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11640 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, stating that the liability for unearned increase could not be imposed on the purchasers as it was not part of the auction terms. The Tax Authority was directed to pay the unearned increase to the DDA, who would then process the necessary documents and permissions for the petitioner. The writ petition was allowed, and the parties were directed to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 22 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11640